Rethinking Career Advancement: Why High-Performing Women Are Stuck and How to Break Free
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Many high-performing women find themselves caught in a paradox: they dedicate a majority of their time to activities their organizations publicly reward—such as committees, Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), mentoring, and external visibility—yet these efforts contribute to a mere fraction of the progress toward promotion. According to research involving over 600 Black women professionals, approximately 60% of their time is spent on such activities, while only about 10% actually drives career advancement. This phenomenon, which we might call the “60/10 problem,” highlights a critical misalignment between what organizations celebrate and what truly propels careers forward.
Personal Experience: When Strategy Outweighs Capacity
Reflecting on my own journey while finishing a doctorate amidst the complexities of parenting and full-time work, I was overwhelmed yet perceived as impressive. My schedule was packed with back-to-back meetings on minimal sleep, and emotional challenges at home compounded the strain. One pivotal moment came when I closed my office door and allowed myself to cry. Following that, I created a detailed spreadsheet cataloging every commitment and its return. The revelation was stark: 60% of my time fueled only 10% of my key goals.
This realization reframed the question from “How do I fit more in?” to “What can I cut?” Within six months, I eliminated 30 hours of weekly commitments, completed my dissertation, improved my performance, and gained clarity on my next career steps. The issue was never a lack of capacity—it was strategy.
Where Women’s Time Actually Goes
The Work Companies Publicly Value
Organizations often emphasize participation in committees, development programs, employee initiatives, and external engagements. Women accept these roles because they align with organizational values, feel meaningful, and signal commitment. However, much of this work is performative in terms of career advancement. While visible, it often lacks a direct connection to decision-making power or promotional pathways. These “vanity metrics” are easy to track but don’t necessarily translate to career growth.
This is not an individual failing. Rather, organizations have constructed these signals and must reconsider what they reward. If systems prioritize metrics like ERG participation and conference appearances but overlook internal visibility and access to decision-makers, they inadvertently sustain a misaligned advancement framework.
The Work Women Feel Responsible to Carry
Beyond visible tasks lies an invisible layer of labor: mentoring others, nurturing team culture, managing conflicts, and bridging interdepartmental gaps. For Black women, this burden often extends to code-switching, representing entire demographics unofficially, and shouldering the organization’s moral compass without reciprocal responsibility from leadership. Such emotional labor sustains organizational health but rarely yields promotions.
The Work That Fills the Space
Lastly, there are numerous low-impact activities—endless meetings without clear outcomes or committees producing unread reports. High-performing women become the default solution for these tasks, reinforcing their reliability. However, reliability alone does not drive promotion; it can, in fact, become a career ceiling.
A Strategy Reset: The 4-Question Career Audit
The necessary shift begins with a fundamental question: If I continue doing this for the next six months, will it increase my chances of promotion? Many women have never been encouraged to assess their work through this lens. Instead, they focus on performance, responsiveness, and contribution, assuming more effort correlates with advancement. This audit disrupts that assumption.
Begin by listing every regular commitment—meetings, projects, committees, mentoring, external engagements, and informal responsibilities. Include tasks outside your formal job description that consume your time. Evaluate each through these four questions:
1. Does this have a direct line to the people who make decisions about my advancement?
Promotions depend on specific leaders, priorities, and outcomes. If an activity doesn’t connect clearly to those decision-makers, it may be valuable but not strategic for advancement.
2. What has this actually produced so far?
- Has it increased your visibility with decision-makers?
- Has it led to measurable outcomes?
- Has it changed leadership’s perception of your capabilities?
This question moves focus from intention to tangible evidence.
3. What does it cost me in time and energy?
Each activity carries a cost—not only time but emotional and cognitive energy. Some roles, especially those involving emotional labor, are high-cost yet low-return. Reducing time spent on such tasks can preserve resources for strategic efforts.
4. Am I doing this because it advances me, or because I was asked and said yes?
Women often respond with reliability and willingness. However, being asked to take on tasks doesn’t guarantee advancement. This question prompts a pause before agreeing, fostering intentional decision-making. A simple response like “Let me think about that” creates essential space to evaluate requests.
The Shift That Moves Careers
This is not a time-management problem—time management can let organizations off the hook by placing responsibility solely on individuals. It is a strategy problem: organizations reward the wrong activities, and women follow these signals in good faith, leading to exhaustion without advancement.
The solution is straightforward: stop measuring effort; start measuring access. At the end of each week, ask yourself: Did anything I did move me closer to the people who determine my next opportunity? If the answer is consistently no, a deeper audit is necessary.
For leaders, the same question applies. If your reward system doesn’t align with advancement drivers, you’re not facing a broken pipeline but a misaligned measurement system. The fix isn’t more programs—it’s better metrics. This is the essential work, not just for individuals but for the systems around them.
