Professional parenting: Why parental leadership still shows up at work

Date:

The Impact of Parental Leadership Styles in the Workplace

The role of a parent is instrumental in the healthy upbringing of a child. That is undisputed. However, parenting is shaped by a wide range of factors, including our own upbringing, life circumstances, personal beliefs, and who we co-parent with, if anyone.

That role belongs in the home.

Managing employees is fundamentally different from raising children. Employees are adults. They have already been through the parenting process and should be at a stage of independence, earning their own money, making decisions, and taking responsibility for themselves. Many may also be parents in their own right.

And yet, research suggests that a parental approach to leadership is far from uncommon.

Why managers slip into parental behaviour

According to studies and reports from Forbes, LinkedIn, and Frontiers in Psychology, a parental style of management often stems from anxiety.

If a manager feels heavily responsible for outcomes, they may believe they need to control every part of the process. In that sense, this behaviour is often less about care and more about managing uncertainty. For example, a 2022 Forbes article highlights that managers under pressure tend to micromanage as a coping mechanism for unpredictability in business outcomes.

In other cases, it can come down to capability. A manager who lacks leadership skills may default to a parental style because it feels familiar. Even those without children can fall into this pattern, as most people have some kind of nurturing instinct.

It is important to note that this is rarely driven by bad intent. In fact, most managers probably mean well and may not even realise they have adopted this approach.

In some cases, ego can also play a part, where the need to assert authority overshadows empowering team members.

What parental management looks like at work

Parental leadership often shows up as a “do what I say” style of management.

The underlying message is: “I know best.”

This can look like:

  • Reluctance to allow independent thought or innovation
  • Overly authoritative communication
  • Stepping in too quickly to solve problems
  • Rescuing employees from consequences
  • Using subtle punishments or emotional pressure

Over time, this creates dependency.

Employees begin asking for approval on minor decisions. They avoid ownership because they fear getting it wrong. When things go badly, responsibility is pushed back to the manager.

The result is often:

  • Quieter teams
  • Fewer ideas
  • Reduced confidence
  • More “just tell me what to do” behaviour

In more severe cases, the workplace starts to resemble obedience and dependency rather than adult collaboration. This often leads to frustration, disengagement, and increased staff turnover, which has been linked in studies to decreased organizational performance and morale (Frontiers in Psychology, 2023).

How to move from parent-child to adult-adult leadership

The first step is reflection.

Ask yourself honestly:

  • How do I behave when things feel uncertain?
  • Do I step in too quickly?
  • Do I create space for ownership?
  • Am I really listening to my team?

It is also worth asking your direct reports how you come across.

If that feels uncomfortable, start with the person most likely to give you honest feedback. Then be open to hearing it.

The goal is to gradually shift towards adult-adult dynamics.

This means:

  • Speaking to colleagues as capable adults, rather than people who need constant supervision
  • Setting clear expectations, then allowing people to own the “how”
  • Asking collaborative questions such as: “What do you think would work?”
  • Admitting uncertainty when appropriate, as vulnerability can strengthen trust and psychological safety
  • Keeping empathy, but avoiding rescuing, over-explaining, or stepping in too quickly

Healthy leadership is built on boundaries

Adult-adult leadership depends on boundaries that are firm but respectful.

That means:

  • Not taking responsibility for other people’s choices
  • Not allowing others to hand their responsibility back to you
  • Using natural consequences rather than subtle control
  • Giving clear, direct feedback instead of creating emotional dependency

This way of working is not only more productive, but also far more enjoyable.

You could argue that much of this aligns with a mentoring style of leadership — and I would agree.

It also supports the long-held belief that mentoring is often the solution to far more than we think.

Sources referenced: Forbes, LinkedIn, Frontiers in Psychology (Frontiersin.org).

For more insights, visit Here.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

When strength becomes risk: why organisations fail at their peak

Understanding the Hidden Risks Behind Organisational Strength “If there is...

Why every founder needs a mentor and how to find the right one

The Quiet Power of Mentorship in Business Success Most business...

Networking is dead: Peer learning wins in the age of AI

AI and the Evolving Landscape of Founder Networking Artificial Intelligence...

Brand Architecture Strategy for Effective Growth

Balancing Brand Architecture in Africa’s Dynamic Markets When organisations begin...